“Biking in the middle of the lane like that sure looks dangerous.”
Driving in the middle of the lane actually protects cyclists against the most common motorist-caused crashes: sideswipes, right hooks, left crosses, and drive-outs. A bicycle driver’s top safety priority is to ensure he or she can be seen by motorists with whom they might potentially be in conflict, and bicycling in the middle of a lane is one of the most effective ways to do that. Most overtaking crashes involve a motorist who attempts to squeeze past (illegally) in a lane that is too narrow to share.

This is the width of a typical lane with vehicles drawn to scale. None of the above vehicles are able to give the required 3ft of passing clearance without changing lanes. A cyclist is far more likely to be sideswiped than run over.
“I thought bicyclists had to keep all the way to the right.”
While Florida law [FS316.2065-5] does say bicyclists must drive “as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway,” it also provides many exceptions to this rule, including:
- When overtaking and passing another vehicle
- When traveling at or near the same speed as other traffic
- When preparing for a left turn
- Where a lane is too narrow to share safely with another vehicle
- To avoid any condition that makes it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge
Many surface hazards – such as potholes, puddles, debris, and broken glass – are more common near the edge of the roadway.
Keeping to the right can often hide a bicyclist from a turning motorist at the critical time and place. Check out this animation to see all the hazards a bicycle driver faces when trying to stay to the right.
“Why weren’t you in the bike lane?”

Anywhere in the bike lane a cyclist would be struck by this door. If the handlebar nicked the door, the cyclist would be thrown into the path of passing cars.
Most of the same reasons why bicyclists will drive towards the center of a lane are good reasons for leaving the bike lane, and Florida’s new mandatory bike lane use law allows cyclists the same exceptions as it does to keeping right in general. Here are just a few reasons:
- Bike lanes collect the debris and glass that is swept off the road. Sometimes you can see it because it’s big, like tree branches, but sometimes only we can see it. A small shard of glass can cause a flat tire. (How many tires did you change on your way to work today?)
- Many bike lanes are designed poorly or just plain dangerous. Bike lanes next to parked cars are often entirely within a hazard area we call “the door zone.” A suddenly-opened door can kill a cyclist.
- When approaching intersections, or in areas with lots of driveways, a bike lane puts us in a conflict zone (shown in the above animation). Bike lanes increase our risk for all of the common crossing and turning crashes.
- It may not be a bike lane. It has become popular to add edge lines several feet to the left of the curb. This space is substandard and not safe for a bicyclist to use, though many bicyclists are tricked into riding there.
Many of the reasons we avoid bike lanes are not visible or apparent to a person in a car. Of course, if a bike lane provides a clean, safe place to ride, we use it.
“Wouldn’t you just be safer biking on the sidewalk?”
While biking on the sidewalk would eliminate the very rare overtaking crash, it would increase the bicyclist’s risk for the far more common right hooks, left crosses, and drive-outs, and would make left turns far more complicated and less safe for the cyclist. Sidewalks present many more blind spots and physical hazards (such as poles, newspaper boxes, and intruding shrubs and tree limbs) than roadways do. If there’s a sidewalk on the left side of the road, but not the right side, cyclists would be traveling against the flow of traffic, which has been shown in traffic safety studies to increase the cyclist’s crash risk by a factor of four.
“You’re gonna get run over.”
Bicyclists across the nation who drive their bicycles in this manner have logged millions of miles without serious crashes or injuries. By comparison, bicyclists who hug the edge of the road, or ride on the sidewalk get into crashes much more frequently.
This video demonstrates why riding farther into the lane is not only safer for a cyclist, but creates less disruption for motorists.
“You’re impeding traffic.”
All road users impede other road users on a routine basis. A motorist waiting to make a left turn from a two-lane street will impede motorists behind him. Transit buses stop to pick up and drop off passengers. Pedestrians in crosswalks impede motorists who are required to yield to them. Convenience must take a back seat to safety. In our training courses we teach cyclists how to minimize the delay they might cause to other road users, while still driving in the safest possible manner.
It’s rare for a bicyclist to cause more than 30 seconds of delay to passing motorists. On the other hand, traffic lights are often as long as a 1:30.
“You’re supposed to ride single-file.”
Florida law allows bicyclists to travel two-abreast, provided doing so does not impede traffic. On streets where the lane is not wide enough the share, a solo bicyclist is allowed to ride in the middle of the lane anyway, so the presence of another bicyclist to her right is of little consequence.
“Bicyclists don’t pay gas taxes, and shouldn’t be allowed on roads.”
Ah, where to begin… First, most bicyclists own and drive motor vehicles, buy gasoline for them, and therefore pay gas taxes. We all also pay gas taxes indirectly when pay for other goods and services; businesses pass along the costs of shipping and travel to customers.
But even if cyclists paid nothing, use of public rights-of-way is not contingent on payment of taxes. The Declaration of Independence does not say “all taxpayers are created equal,” but “all men are created equal” (meaning persons), and traveling along a public right-of-way is an essential liberty.
Many other taxes contribute to the construction and maintenance of public roads, including property taxes, sales taxes, impact fees, and more. Much of the gas tax is used to widen roads to accommodate more and more cars.
Gas taxes also go toward the construction of sidewalks along many roads. Using the same “don’t pay gas taxes” reasoning, school children should not be allowed to walk to school on sidewalks because they don’t pay gas taxes.
“Bicyclists should be required to have driver’s licenses.”
As with gas taxes, most do. But the reason people are required to be licensed to drive a motor vehicle is because they are inherently dangerous devices which pose a great danger to others. Motor vehicle drivers kill over 35,000 and injure over 2 million people a year in the United States. Careless or reckless motorists are a danger to everyone, while careless or reckless bicyclists are mostly a danger to themselves. If bicyclists should be required to be licensed, then so should pedestrians, as they pose about the same danger to others.
“Too many bicyclists think the laws don’t apply to them.”
We agree! We encourage and train bicyclists to drive their vehicles in the safest legal manner. Bicyclists who violate the law not only endanger themselves, but make those of us trying to do the right thing look bad. You can help us by calling the police (non-emergency number, please) when you see bicyclists doing the following: running red lights, blowing through stop signs, driving on the wrong side of the road (facing other traffic), and driving at night without front and rear lights. But please don’t call the police if you see one of us in the middle of the lane!





74 Comments
Keri has out-done herself. I doubt one could find a better-looking, or more inspiring cycling education site anywhere on the web.
Outdone herself is right! I hope you realize, Keri, that your work is, literally, lifesaving.
It’s AMAZING!
This is a great resource. On ebikes, we get a lot of people that haven’t ridden much, and this is a handy way to explain the law and safe practices to new riders.
I wish I could hand a copy of this to every driver who’s ever honked at me for taking the lane. (I live in California, but our cycling laws seem to be the same.)
I’m also one of the exceptions who has never had a driver’s license or a car, and I still follow traffic laws more than a lot of cyclists … and a lot of car drivers! Mandatory licensing obviously doesn’t mean that everyone in a car obeys every law when they can get away with breaking them.
I was going to rant a little more about that, but I noticed that the linked post about scofflaws covers it nicely.
This is GREAT!!! Where can I get the sign/shirt? With so much access to internet via laptops and smart phones some motorists might actually look this up.
Made my day.
Y’all have made the world a better place, too.
Keri, WOW! Thank you so much! This is great!
I’m going to try to promote this to hundreds, no, thousands of people. This is GREAT STUFF!
Agreed, wonderful! I’m spreading it far and wide too, starting with sending this site URL to the Bicycle Coalition of Maine’s education committee and education director.
I thought of another FAQ that wasn’t included: “Isn’t it safer to ride against traffic, because you can see the cars coming?” I’m sure I don’t have to tell you how often I hear that!
I just saw some idiot claim on a mailing list “Lots of unsubstantiated claims. It’s simply an opinion piece. There are no lessons.” — how do people manage to be that stupid and dishonest?
mk, Use of our roads has become shrouded in taboo and superstition to facilitate the culture of speed. Many people have taken that on like a fear-based religion, so any challenge to it causes their minds to snap shut and their attitudes to turn hostile. There isn’t much we can do to reach people who put up a wall. We must concentrate on positively influencing people whose minds are open. Some day the intransigent ones will find the attitudes around them have changed. They might even notice the roads have become a better, more civil and cooperative place. They will change too, or become silent.
I have been trying to say those words for so long… they explain my view so freaking well! I do get stuck trying to change those who “put up walls” a bit too often though. I am going to quote this paragraph for the rest of my life.
When and where is the next course?
Gabe, I’m hoping to get an announcement up today. We’re planning to offer a classroom session on Monday 7/5 from 6-9PM. We’re waiting on word about the venue.
Thanks, Keri! Mighk sent a heads-up to me re: the announcement. Do you want an RSVP or reservation, or just show up?
Gabe, I added a sign-up form to the post about the course.
http://cyclingsavvy.org/2010/07/class-date-the-truth-and-techniques-of-traffic-cycling/
you can also RSVP on facebook
Thanks! I look forward to meeting you there.
Thank Keri, Good job number 1!
Empowerment and now a better understanding on how to ride in traffic. Thank you so much Pete>
Rich had the right idea.
Where can I get the “Hows My Driving” shirt pictured above?
Maybe a few drivers would actually look it up.
Fabulous.
Keri, utterly true about the closed minds. We’re asking people to let go of beliefs in which they have an emotional investment. Some don’t want to do that.
Regarding the ‘unsubstantiated claims’ accusation: that’s nonsense.
True, this FAQ isn’t full of footnotes. But the information has all been verified by a variety of sources.
My frustration is that cyclists around me rarely heed the traffic laws they ARE bound to. There are a number of them that are in my area and I rarely if ever see anyone stop at a stop sign. I’ve cringed in my car numerous times when I’ve seen someone barely be hit because they blew through a sign in front of a car who did wait. Obviously, this is not everyone, but I’m not sure the cyclists in Texas are up to par with those in more active states. LOL
The only thing that aggravates me is cyclists who camp out in the middle lane on busy streets. It’s one thing if I can pass them, but if the other lane is too busy and cars become blocked, that is not acceptable. No one would patiently stand for a car doing 10 miles an hour on a busy road; cyclists shouldn’t be able to either. In those instances, I wish the cyclists would realize that they are NOT a car and can’t go that speed. What is the law regarding this?
I’m also a cyclist, even though I’m referring to them as a separate group here. I was even hit by a motorist who wasn’t paying attention at a stop sign even when I did stop; which is why it bothers me when cyclists DON’T stop.
“The only thing that aggravates me is cyclists who camp out in the middle lane on busy streets.”
Lane position is a function of lane width, not speed or traffic volume. If the lane is not wide enough for in-lane passing, then the cyclist’s lane position is irrelevant. Just like a slow motorist’s lane position is irrelevant. Generally, if a cyclist is “camped” in the lane, it’s most likely because there’s no safer position to be on the roadway.
At the same time, cyclists hate being tailgated even more than motorists hate being unable to pass. It’s a pretty rare cyclist who likes having impatient motorists behind them for any longer than necessary.
Check the “slow moving vehicle” laws in your state. In general, slow vehicles are restricted to the right lane (if there are marked lanes) or as far right as “practicable” (if there are no marked lanes). The same concept that applies to farm tractors or horse-drawn wagons applies to bikes.
Some states further require bikes to be as far right as “practicable” *within* the right lane under certain conditions, but *not* if the lane is too narrow for in-lane passing, in which case the normal slow vehicle rule applies.
Some states (typically the western mountainous ones) have an additional rule that requires slow vehicles to turn off the roadway (where safe to do so) if five or more vehicles are behind them and unable to pass on a *two lane* (one each way) road. The concept is a tractor-trailer or RV on a winding mountain road. That rule doesn’t apply on multi-lane roads.
Aside from that special rule, slow traffic is not required to leave the roadway anytime somebody faster comes along.
If you can’t pass a cyclist immediately on a multi-lane road, it’s because there are too many motorists, not because there’s one cyclist.
In my experience, it’s awfully rare for a motorist to have to wait more than about 10 seconds to safely pass me.
I can see this from the cyclists stand point.
But can you honestly tell me that if you were driving in your car and the car in front of you was doing 10 miles an hour with no one in front of them that it wouldn’t bother you at all? I have been a passenger many times when a cyclist who complains about this very issue is driving their car behind someone going slower than them…and EVERY ONE of them will complain about the cars who go slower. Most get flustered if I ask them why it doesn’t bother them if it were a bike going that slow.
Granted, we have a very high rate of road rage here in Texas. LOL
“But can you honestly tell me that if you were driving in your car and the car in front of you was doing 10 miles an hour with no one in front of them that it wouldn’t bother you at all?”
It wouldn’t bother me for very long. I would change lanes and pass if I wanted to go faster.
This situation isn’t all that rare. For example, if the car in front of me is parallel parking, they’ll slow from 10 to zero, then about minus five. With nobody in front of them.
Next time anybody delays you, be they motorist or cyclist or pedestrian, start your stopwatch. See how much actual delay they’re causing you. Keep separate totals for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians.
As a motorist, almost all my delays are caused by other motorists. Either they’re going slower than I’d like to go. Or there are so many of us that we’re all going slower than we’d like to go. Or the traffic light turns red so a whole bunch of motorists can cross the road I’m on while I sit and wait.
In general, our roads are first come, first served. The driver ahead of you has the right of way. If somebody ahead of you is going a whole lot slower than you, you should usually be able to notice it with plenty of time to react.
When I’m in a lane controlling situation, I’ve found most motorists change lanes to pass me long before they catch up to me, and pass with zero delay.
Perhaps some clarification is necessary. Did you mean “camp out in the middle lane” or “in the middle OF THE lane”? Slower vehicles — motorized or not — are always expected to use the use the rightmost through lane on a roadway with more than one one lane in that direction of travel. One multi-lane roads, cyclists controlling the right-hand lane rarely impede traffic to any significant amount.
In our course we teach cyclists how to minimize delay for others without compromising their own safety.
Ah, poor wording on my part. I mainly meant cyclists who are using lanes other than the right lane. There’s a particular strip of road near our house that attracts cyclists (long road with only a few intersections); the road has two lanes going each direction. I was referring to when they are in the middle lanes (left lanes). It is not uncommon to come upon a group of 20+ cyclists who are taking up both lanes and unwilling to move. Frustrating.
My bad. Nah, the riding in the right lane doesn’t bother me since I can usually get around it. If not, I just honk a lot and rev my engine. (JUST KIDDING!!!)
Ok, that’s different. Cycling group behavior is a whole ‘nother topic. Typically, groups might use a double-pacelane (two across) which fits in one lane. And most groups are hyper-vigilant about overtaking traffic, yelling “car back” whenever somebody wants to pass.
Tell us more about this group or this location that might involve them using both lanes. Is this at a traffic light or midblock?
Just an excellent, excellent resource. There’s some variation in state laws of course (not required to use bike lanes here, for example) , but regardless it has valuable info that every cyclist should know. I posted a link on our local cycling org’s website.
Here’s a Google Map street view of the area where I most often encounter the group taking up both lanes: Street view
You can see that there is very little around (close to DFW airport) so it is a great place to ride. Unfortunately when cyclists are riding in both lanes, you can’t pass until they move because of the median. As to what group it is that rides here, not sure since I just ride solo.
Would love to read more about the cycling group behavior. I’m sure it is a whole other creature.
I’m hoping my points haven’t offended anyone. Thank you for your patience in answering!
I doubt your points have offended anyone on this forum, David.
The kind of behavior you’re describing upsets many cyclists as much as it does non-cyclists. It’s completely selfish (not to mention illegal). I’ve ceased participating in most group rides because I don’t want to be associated with such behavior.
It’s not much different than hosting a big, loud party in a dense neighborhood on a Wednesday night. Aside from legality, it’s just plain rude.
We also have a group riding option in our curriculum which shows cyclists how to manage their groups to minimize impact on others while maintaining safety and the social benefits of group riding.
Playing devil’s advocate and making some assumptions, it might not be illegal for a group of cyclists to use both lanes, if they are the only traffic. Most slow vehicle/bicycle laws refer to the normal speed of traffic “at that time”. If the bicyclists are the only traffic, then whatever speed they are going is normal at that time.
Or if they’re going the same speed as the motorists, then it’s not illegal, because they’re not slower. Or if some of them are preparing to turn left.
I’ll assume a large group of club riders might choose that road because it has very little motor traffic. If they stick to the right lane when they’re the only traffic, the occasional motorist might pass them at full speed in the left lane. By controlling the left lane until faster traffic arrives, the passing driver will first need to slow a bit until the group reorganizes, and will pass at a more reasonable speed. Total motorist delay is probably 5-10 seconds.
If the group stays in the right lane, a conscientious motorist would slow to a reasonable passing speed on their own and experience a similar delay, but not all motorists are that attentive.
I’m making a lot of assumptions here. I could be completely wrong.
It sounds like cycling groups are attracted to that road because it sees so little motor traffic. (The street and satellite views are essentially empty.) Or because there aren’t a whole lot of other non-freeway roads to get around the airport.
So if there are 20+ cyclists who have the whole road to themselves, and a lone motorist catches up to them in the left lane, how long does it take for the group to notice and make room for the motorist to pass?
Or are you saying they will stay spread across both lanes for several miles, not allowing anybody to pass?
StreetView shots are often empty; they do most of their driving of major roads on weekend mornings so you can see the surroundings better.
That road is certainly less used than other roads in the area during off hours, but it is still a main road, despite the picture, and the quickest way to get around the airport for the locals (non-locals never realize it’s there). During rush hours it is really busy, but to be fair, I’ve never seen bikes on it during those times.
Most often cyclists will indeed move to the right lane, though it is a coordinated effort when there are is a large number. Unfortunately, it is not terribly uncommon for them to wait until an intersection to turn off of the road though and block cars. I actually never realized it was illegal for them to block both lanes until reading this page so I was unaware I had a course of action to take.
Also never thought to see if it was the same group each time…though you can bet I’ll be looking for that on my next encounter! LOL
Glad no one was upset by the questions or points. Really did mean them all respectfully.
Awesome explanation of how i ride and why i do that. Thanks.
What a great explanation! These are techniques I use every time I ride and so far have kept me safe and, for the most part, motorists calm.
I think the issue of 20 cyclists blocking the road is more about mob psychology (and testosterone for the racers) than cycling etiquette. When I lead a group that large, it only takes a reminder before we leave to obey the law and ride courteously to get them to get into a double line.
My biggest frustration is reaching the many bicyclists that don’t know what’s safe, riding against traffic, blowing stop signs, riding on sidewalks, etc. These cyclists are the ones riding is street clothes on their way to work or the market.
How do we get this kind of information in front of these riders?
The law says stay to the right , right? So stay to the right !!! Riding your bike in the middle of the street is by far the most dangerous thing you can do on the road for a number of reasons . I’ve seen people die from CAR vs CAR accidents ! What do you think is going to happen when you get rearended on your BIKE ? You’ll call a lawyer and want to waste taxpayer time with your bs HOBBY . Douch bags !
No Hector, the law does not say “Stay to the right.” The law says “Stay to the right in certain circumstances,” and those circumstances are not all that common.
My “hobby” is a vehicle which takes me to the office each day, to the store, etc, just like your vehicle.
A motorist who can’t see and slow for a cyclist plainly in front of him in the lane has absolutely no business being behind the wheel of a motor vehicle.
BTW Hector, on this forum, when we see people who use childish name calling as you did, we assume they’re not smart enough to write a coherent argument based reason and evidence.
You said:A motorist who can’t see and slow for a cyclist plainly in front of him in the lane has absolutely no business being behind the wheel of a motor vehicle.
So your saying that the majority of drivers have ” absolutely no business behind the wheel of a motor vehicle ” in the U.S. There is one DEATH every 13 minutes from a AUTOMOBILE accident . So I ask you again , what do you think is going to happen when a 4000 pound vehicle slams into you ?! With over 6 million car vs car crashes a year the odds are against you! Good luck
Here’s a challenge : ride your bike in the middle of the street on MLK BLVD anywhere USA . Let’s see how far you get before someone runs you off the road !
DOUCH BAGS !
I estimate I’ve been passed by over a million motorists in my cycling life Hector. All managed to avoid hitting me.
Hector: let’s say you’re doing 45 mph on one of our arterial roads, and I’m ahead of you in the center of the lane doing 15 mph on my bike. That means you’re approaching me at 30 mph. Traffic engineers use a concept of “safe stopping distance,” which includes perception time, reaction time, and braking distance. Average perception and reaction time is considered to be 2.5 seconds. The combined perception/reaction/braking distance at 30 mph (to slow from 45 mph to 15 mph) is about 225 feet.
So are you saying you cannot reliably see a bicyclist directly in front of you from 225 feet? (And let’s just keep this simple and say it’s daytime.) If so, then you also cannot see a child in a crosswalk from 225 feet if you’re approaching said child from 35 mph.
If you answer that you cannot see either me or that child in the above situations, then yes, you have no business being behind the wheel of a motor vehicle.
Hector likes irrelevant numbers. Here are some more relevant ones.
While a person might die every 13 minutes in an auto crash, it’s one every 11 hours for bicyclists. But only about 5 percent of bicyclist fatalities involve an overtaking motorist in daylight hours. So an overtaking motorist kills a bicyclist about once every 234 hours in the US (about 38 per year). But most of those overtaking deaths are on high-speed rural highways; rarely on urban or suburban streets.
38 deaths per year in a nation of over 300 million? Doesn’t strike me as a terribly big problem. By comparison, over 500 people a year drown in swimming pools.
Thanks Mighk!
See people like Hector are going to commit vehicular manslaughter because they are so sure of the law they made up in there head. They believe they are so right that they think they can hit a cyclist and get away with it. I bet Hector is the kind of guy that tries to pass a cyclist even when the cyclist is keeping up with traffic.
Just found your site. Great resource! But it leaves me with some questions:
1. In Oregon, you are required to use a bike lane if one is provided. (Getting bike laws changed in this state is about as hard as passing a sales tax, so let’s just skip the advocacy part for now, ok?) And most people on bikes seem to obey that rule.
An accompanying law says that if a bicyclist is “doored” by a driver while riding in the bike lane it is always automatically the car driver’s fault. This law helped me to win settlement when such an event led to serious injury a number of years ago; without that law I would’ve been screwed. I wonder how things would play out if bicyclists were forced to take the lane without requiring car drivers to drive more slowly. And while your stance of safety trumping convenience is laudable, it isn’t a reality in our current landscape.
How do we, as transportational bicyclists, proceed when car use continues to be so heavily subsidized as to prevent change of attitudes that would lead to an increase in road safety?
2. I understand the logic of trying to get rid of bike lanes and that encouraging bicyclists to Take The Lane is part of The Golden Mean towards that end. But what if you’re older or slower and cannot possibly ride fast enough in the lane to avoid pissing off drivers, or in some cases, getting pulled over by copes for “impeding traffic flow”?
ISince John Forester first began preaching vehicular cycling, up to the present day, time and again the answer to this question has basically been something like “get faster.”
I think that’s ridiculous! I should not have to TRAIN to be able to ride safely to and from work.
Since you seem to have done a lot of work in this area, I invite YOU to offer a better response.
Beth,
Thank you for bringing up the issue of speed. And age, for that matter.
I did not become a really competent bicycle driver until I slowed down. Partly due to age and partly due to the fact that I often haul cargo, I no longer even try to ride fast. My average cruising speed is between 9 and 15mph and typically on the low end of that.
I tend to ride strategically, connecting quiet streets (because they have shade!) with short stretches of busy roads. But if I have to ride 10 miles down an arterial road, I feel no pressure to ride “fast.” As Mighk says, on a 45mph road there is no perceptual difference between the speed of a “fast” cyclist and my comfortable pace. The day I got that epiphany was the day cycling became truly pleasurable and viable.
This seems unimaginable to people who have not experienced cycling on a system of roads with no bike facilities, but (with the exception of narrow 2-lane roads that are at capacity) it really is easier, safer and less stressful to use a regular travel lane.
Beth:
While Forester did some good and important things, I think he also set vehicular cycling up for failure with nonsense such as “get fast.” On a road posted at 45 mph where many motorists are doing 50, the difference between 10 mph and 20 mph for cyclist speed is rather irrelevant. Most of my riding is under 15 mph. I don’t have problems controlling a lane with 45-50 mph traffic.
What we have learned is that on higher speed roads one’s lane position must move farther to the left. If you ride in the right wheel track, as the League recommends, a motorist who is way back at the decision-making distance will often assume that you are closer to the curb (their expectation) and that they’ll be able to pass within your lane. As they get closer, they realize there may not be enough room to pass, and they either try to squeeze past and/or get frustrated. When you’re in the center of the lane (or just left of center) it is clear from a great distance that there’s not room to share, so they change lanes as soon as possible.
The practices we promote are not theoretical. We use them routinely with much better results than even the League’s recommendations. We’ve taught novice riders these principles and practices and they are putting them to use.
As for dooring, while it’s nice that Oregon motorists are automatically at fault (really, they’re at fault in probably all states, since the UVC requires motorists to ensure it is safe to open the door before doing so), that doesn’t guarantee that every motorist will use due care. By riding outside the door zone I can guarantee that a motorist won’t door me . No traffic engineer, legislator, bikeway advocate, or police officer can guarantee that won’t happen if I’m in a door-zone bike lane.
As some may know, I’m one of those guys with a “How’s My Driving? * CyclingSavvy.org” sign on the back of my bike.
This morning during my commute I got a genuinely friendly “Your driving’s just fine, man!” out the passenger window of an electrical contractor’s truck.
[...] CyclingSavvy.org / Commute [...]
This afternoon a driver in a pick-up pulled up alongside and said something to the effect of “I don’t like your driving.” He wasn’t being obnoxious (no horn, no harassment).
I asked why and he said I should be on the sidewalk. I asked, “You mean like this one (I pointed to the one to my right which ended a few feet ahead); that ends and goes nowhere?” And he said “Yes.” (He must felt silly at that.)
Then he fell back to some variation on “Riding in the road is dangerous,” to which I replied I’d been doing so for over 35 years without injury.
I suggested he go to this website if he was interested in a real discussion.
[...] the How’s My Driving Faq at CyclingSavvy. See more traffic cycling animations at [...]
Great information and discussion here.
One thing that could be added to the argument for riding two abreast is that a group of two or more riders riding two abreast will impeded other traffic less than the same group of cyclists riding single lane while controlling the lane (they are using the roadway space more efficiently). The group riding two abreast will also be more visible than a single line of cyclists. So two abreast seems the way to go for two or more cyclists on lanes less than 14 feet wide.
I see it will take a while to mine the important information on your site. One question tho, and this is not meant to negate your efforts. Does the League of American Bicyclist provide any support for your down to earth views and how have they responded to your “rogue” not their official safety class? Keep up the great work. You can quote me: “It’s not why we bicycle but how we roll”
Thanks Gatherer.
CyclingSavvy is a program of Florida Bicycle Association and is entirely independent of the League’s.
We believe a free market should provide choices. That’s as true with cycling instruction as it is with the bicycles themselves.
[...] Why do you ride like that? [...]
After watching your excellent clip on taking the lane and observing the traffic environment I am reminded how fortunate we are in Minneapolis to have an extensive trail system and a network of side streets that parallel thoroughfares. Nonetheless I am also reminded that America is made up of thousands of Orlandos, which is most likely the cause of falling ridership in America. As more affluent people leave the city, move to the suburbs, there are less opportunities to utilize the bike as a commuter when commute distances are greater than 5 to 10 miles. Are Floridians using bikes to run everyday errands where traffic speeds are greater than 30mph? What is the center city or old Orlando like? Surely there is a sub bike culture that commutes to work, school and play with out having to resort to playing chicken with cars. It is a divided America I’m sorry to say. What is biking like in small towns? Leesburg for instance. Ocala? Mount Dora, god forbid a hill! The side of biking that takes people into close contact with high speed automobiles is nerve racking even for proficient bicyclist. Would you say there is a growing community of cyclist in Florida that are willing to take chances on these multi- lane and high speed roads? Some of the responses have been that people get into the wave. That sounds like little fun. Are any alternative routes more sane and peaceful? Check out my new blog, its more photos right now than politics.
domotion2011@wordpress
Gatherer, the more comprehensive answers to your questions can be found at CommuteOrlando. In the burbs there are not a lot of good quiet routes. In some suburban corridors there are useful trails. In the urban core, speeds are low and there are lots of route options.
It is my belief that I DON’T “take chances” when riding on any road. My commute and errand running takes me on both two lane and four lane roads with posted speeds between 35-50mph. There is nothing written that says you HAVE to ride these multi-lane, or high speed roads.
An informed and confident bicycle driver can comfortably navigate any road (exceptions to limited access and other prohibited access). Planning is needed on ones part to limit the amount of time spent traveling on the multi-lane, high speed roads. Not in so much as they are dangerous, just noisy and annoying, such as during peak times.
Love your website!
Several months ago, there was a discussion involving delay
“But can you honestly tell me that if you were driving in your car and the car in front of you was doing 10 miles an hour with no one in front of them that it wouldn’t bother you at all?”
I often encounter a car that not only makes me slow down but that actually stops in front of me (and other drivers too)! The thing that is different is that typically no-one gets upset, honks or otherwise behaves childishly because we all understand the situation.
What I’m describing is the common practice of waiting for opposing traffic to clear before making a left turn. It happens to all of us — we all understand that the driver must yield to opposing traffic. Unfortunately, cyclists are not understood. We are resented as intruders on the road.
We need to work on educating society.
Fred
I guess I’m just an unsavy cyclist. I’m the one that rides all the way to the right as possible, only coming out to the left when I won’t obstruct traffic. Been doing it that way for over 20 years of cycling as my primary form of transportation. What is it they say about old dogs…
Dear John Gault (who is my favorite fictional character and the inspiration for my personal code-of-living),
Keri posed a question to me when I took the CS course recently in Orlando: “When should one legal road user be expected to endanger his/her life for the convenience of another legal road user?”
In my world, the answer is “NEVER”. By my code, doing so would be morally wrong.
(And I say that with a shrug)
Who is John Gault?
I think the authors’ advice is rather extreme. Riding in the center of a lane all the time throws away a great deal of what bicycle is all about. Among other things, bicycles are great because they don’t take much space on the road, and we as a society should celebrate this fact and take advantage of it.
Having said that, I applaud the quality of the material, very valuable animations and videos, thank you!
Alexey:
We do not recommend cycling in the center of the lane at all times. In the CyclingSavvy course we stress that lane positioning is context sensitive. We teach a practice we call Control & Release in which we assert our safety needs while also working to accommodate motorists’ desire to pass.
Mighk, thank you for clarifying. This page seems to present only one side of the advice. Is there another page on this site which talks about situations where you recommend to moving to the right?
Alexey:
When a lane is share-able, then I share it. The diagrams and videos on this page show cyclists attempting to share a lane that is realln not safely “share-able”, and then show a cyclist controling a non-share-able lane. There are no diagrams or videos here showing a cyclist sharing a lane by riding to the right, but if there was such a video or diagram it would show at least a 14′ wide lane with no cars parked on the shoulder (creating a “door zone” danger), with no motorist “blind spots” creating pull-out hazards, with no intersections. This pretty much describes limited-access highways that have long stretches between on and off ramps, most of which ban bicyclists.
“No other road users impede traffic as frequently or severely as the drivers of private automobiles.”
this entire article is ludicrous…..whats the ratio of cars to bikes on the road…10,000 to 1? maybe more than 10,000? of course cars will impede traffic more often
Then “entire article is ludicrous” because we pointed out the obvious?
For those who think it is safer to ride against traffic becuz u can see the cars coming, has it accured to u tht if u ride on tht side a car pulling off a road on tht side of the road may not look tht way an pull out and hit u? Yeah thts right
[...] risk by knowing how to position yourself in the lane. This page is SO educational for both drivers of automobiles and operators of bicycles. Please read the information, watch the video, and view the animation. Then come back and ask [...]