William Phelps Eno honorary driver's license issued in 1912

William Phelps Eno, My Hero

On this day devoted to love, I admit to adoring a man who’s not my husband.

Yes, Harold knows. He also thinks highly of the guy, though he’d draw the line at “adore.” Not me. I love what this guy did for humanity.

thank the father of traffic safety for your safe travelsWhen you go out today — reasonably certain of being able to get where you want to go without incident — thank this man. He had something to do with your safe travels, even though you’ve probably never heard of him.

His name is William Phelps Eno. Well over 100 years ago he created pretty much everything we take for granted as we move about on our public roadways. Stop signs, crosswalks, traffic circles, one-way streets, drivers’ licenses: That’s all from Eno, and much more.

Perhaps the biggest thing he did was develop the “Rules of Movement” that we still use today. (At least most of us. Yes, there are people on bicycles who don’t use them — and more terrifying, people in cars. I’ll get to that in a minute.)

Eno didn’t invent the Rules of Movement. He observed the way ships operate on the high seas, and applied these ideas to our public roads.

New York City 1909 traffic code

A section of the world’s first traffic regulations, drafted by Eno and issued by New York City in 1909

Our streets and roads are BY FAR our largest public property. We’ve used them for centuries not just for travel, but for socializing, commerce and play. Lately we’ve been using our public property to make statements. (#InsertYourCause, and go march on a large arterial road.)

Eno started thinking about traffic in 1867, when he was 9 years old and stuck with his mother in a buggy on a New York City street. He later wrote: “That very first traffic jam (many years before the motor car came into use) will always remain in my memory. There were only about a dozen horses and carriages involved, and all that was needed was a little order to keep the traffic moving. Yet nobody knew exactly what to do; neither the drivers nor the police knew anything about the control of traffic.”

guy riding wildly on his bicycle

The Scorcher

Things got worse before they got better, in part because of nifty new machines that everyone was riding. Hooray for bicycles!

At the turn of the 20th Century, “scorchers” were accused of scaring horses and causing crashes. Many victims were children playing in the street, which led to a public outcry. Somebody had to do something!

Eno did.

He’s described as a “public-spirited citizen” who insisted three things were needed to bring order to our streets:

  • Concise, simple and just rules, easily understood, obeyed and enforced under legal enactment
  • These rules must be so placed and circulated that there can be no excuse for not knowing them
  • Police must be empowered and ordered to enforce them, and trained for that purpose

At age 40 he left his family business to work on road safety and traffic control. His innovations led to the elegance and simplicity that define the US transportation system, and others around the world modeled upon it.

People on bicycles fit right in. It took me awhile to truly understand and embrace this. I learned the basics when I first took CyclingSavvy. What? The guy who created the rule book for traffic flow and designed the world’s first traffic plans and is honored as the Father of Traffic Safety never drove a car? Eno died in 1945, so he could have driven one. He’s said to have detested cars, and predicted they’d be a passing fad.

Father of Traffic Safety never drove a car

Well! This was inspiring. I loved learning that the rules regarding traffic were developed well before the rise of the automobile. But look what’s happened since then. We’ve watched Eno’s ideas scale “up” to the point where private auto use has become ubiquitous. These days, cars are overused to the point of ridiculousness. One of every four auto trips in America is less than a mile. That’s heartbreaking.

Our challenge now is showing how Eno’s ideas scale “down.” Hell, yes, you can use your bike instead of your car!

There are certain things you need to know to keep yourself safe. Back to bicyclists and motorists who think the rules don’t apply to them:

Your safety is a product of your behavior.

When crashes happen, we can almost always identify the behavior that led to the crash. That’s a big part of what we do in CyclingSavvy — showing people what really causes crashes, and how to avoid them.

I wish Eno were here. I’d take him on a bike ride. He’d instantly understand how savvy cycling — created by two other people nobody’s ever heard of — could make the use of cars…not a thing of the past — they’re just too useful — but much less necessary.

I will be forever grateful to Eno for teaching me that the Rules of Movement — which he so brilliantly applied to our public roads — have nothing to do with size or speed. They have a whole lot to do with another “S” word, as well as a couple of “C” words. (No, one of those “C” words is not cars!)

Safety, courtesy and cooperation are the hallmarks of the US transportation system. While the rare bad encounter sticks in your craw, think about how good and uneventful your typical commute is, however you convey yourself. For this you can thank Eno.

 

4 replies
  1. Tim Potter
    Tim Potter says:

    I’ll add my name to the list of people who adore this guy. What a hero indeed!

    Great to read that he based his early thoughts/ plans on the way ships move about our waterways. That’s something I wrote about years ago w/out knowing this. I proposed to several bike advocacy organizations and leading advocates that bicycling advocates should push the basic laws of the waterways to our roadways as another way to assert our rights & needs; namely that vessels that are under their own power (canoes, kayaks, row-boats) or smaller/ weaker (smaller sail boats) having the right-of-way over power boats (that typically have more control over their vehicles – not talking about huge ships/ freighters obviously). I was more or less laughed at. I still feel there’s merit to the concept as waterway rules are unchanged and they’re respected by everyone moving on water around the world.

    Reply
    • John S. Allen
      John S. Allen says:

      Tim Potter’s proposal that bicyclists should have right of way over motorists is unworkable.

      * On the one hand, going to the other extreme, if might made right, the only vehicles on the road would be armored cars and army tanks (close paraphrase of John Forester). So, for this reason, the rules must be essentially the same for all vehicles.

      * On the other hand, if,as Tom proposes, different yielding rules applied to different classes of vehicles, the result would be chaos and gridlock because yielding rules would differ from moment to moment depending on types of vehicles encounter one another (witness, for example, my post on this blog about horses — an unusual example where this distinction actually applies, and all other vehicle operators must defer to a horseback rider). Special rules for motorists were in fact tried in the early days of the automobile, before Eno, see http://pazhayathu.blogspot.com/2015/08/1896-cars-maximum-road-speed-by-law-was.html — but were quickly dropped as impractical.

      The traffic law recognizes two major categories, vehicles, and pedestrians. When some users are not compatible with others on a roadway, bikeway or footway, then that category is prohibited or its use is limited, so we have speed limits, truck restrictions, prohibitions of horses, bicycles or pedestrians on limited-access highways, of motor vehicles on bikeways or footways etc. The one major distinction is that pedestrians travel slowly enough that they can usually bump into each other without injury, and can maneuver around each other without formal rules, so the rules are much looser for pedestrians than for operators of vehicles, which travel faster, are less maneuverable, and almost always cause damage and injury when colliding with each other or with pedestrians.

      Reply
  2. John S. Allen
    John S. Allen says:

    So, Eno didn’t drive a motor vehicle (though he rode in them). But it is reported that he developed the rules of the road starting with maritime rules. So, did he himself sail a boat? Did he ride a horse? Drive a horse and carriage? Ride a bicycle? Experience with any or all of those would help in developing of traffic rules Is there a biography of him which would answer these questions?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply