How to Get Great Passing

Recently, a friend who works in a bicycle-related job showed me a letter he had received from another cyclist, along with two orange cloth arrows about a foot in length. The letter writer stated that much of his riding was on two-lane rural roads (one lane each way), many with no usable shoulder. Motorists very rarely more than touched their left wheels on the double yellow line to pass him.

So he created these arrows and wore one on the back of his jacket, pointing to the left. He claimed that the difference he got in passing distance from motorists was incredible since he started wearing it, and wanted to share his great idea.

Many of us have seen photos on social media of cyclists with similar motivations. Some have gone so far as to mount on their bike some kind of stick with a flag on the end, pointing left, to ensure motorists give them their legally required three feet of passing clearance.

rigid three-foot ruler on bicycle

This looks like more than three feet, and is rigid besides. If hit, it would likely cause the cyclist to crash

pool noodle attached to bicycle

A pool noodle is more flexible, in case of being hit, but we’re still not sure it’s best

"Smiley Faces" width extender attached to bicycle

This one attempts to calm motorists down with smiley faces :-)

One person even made car-sized PVC-tube framing to surround his bike! (Sorry I can’t find the image now.)

I don’t want to outright dismiss these well-meaning and original attempts at a solution. Fear of traffic is real. Many cyclists do struggle with getting adequate passing clearance. Maybe these devices do some good. They certainly get noticed.

One sentence of the cyclist’s letter to my friend leapt out at me:

Since I started wearing this, almost all the cars that pass me give me plenty of room, some even going almost completely over the double yellow line!

My immediate response when I read that was: But I get that behavior too, without wearing a flag on my back!

I do usually wear a hi-viz jacket, and use lights at night and in some daytime bad-weather conditions, but that’s about it.

No arrows, no sticks, no noodles.

Great passing was not always the norm for me. In my early days of commuting, I remember some terrifying close passes. Nowadays, it’s rare that a motorist doesn’t move at least halfway over a double yellow line to pass me, assuming there is no oncoming traffic. Many change lanes completely to pass. What’s different?

I believe the difference is almost entirely due to my behavior, in two ways.


First, I often use more of the travel lane now than I used to, even if I’m not completely controlling it. One of the first pieces of good advice I got about traffic cycling — from an internet forum no less — was that the farther you ride from the edge of the road, the better passing you get. It’s counter-intuitive, but it works!

Why? I don’t know for sure, but I have some theories. It was suggested that you tend to get a similar amount of room on your left as you have left yourself on your right, and that is also my experience. Maybe people tend to picture you as if you were centered in a lane, with equal space on both sides, even if you’re really not.

I have no idea if that’s really the reason. Probably a better explanation is CyclingSavvy’s teaching about the importance of relevance.

When you ride very close to the edge, not only are you less noticeable, but even if you are seen, you are not perceived as relevant. Motorists approaching from behind, even when they see you, are more likely to assume there’s room to pass, so they don’t slow down or move over right away.

When they’re closer, they may realize there could be a problem. But by then, they have less time and room to react, especially if they feel pressure from additional traffic behind them. So they decide they don’t have any choice but to pass.

There are many other reasons it’s better to ride farther away from the edge:

The more room you give yourself, the more room others give you:

(Wondering about that double yellow line issue? You can read a lot more about it in this article on our companion site,

Control and Release

The second related behavioral change that I’ve made over the years is implementing CyclingSavvy’s advice on “control and release.” I don’t think I even realized early in my cycling career that my closest passes came when there was oncoming traffic. I was just squeezing myself to the edge all the time, without regard to the situation!

CyclingSavvy taught me that it was not only possible, legal, and safe, but that it isn’t even rude to control your lane in situations where the road is too narrow to be passed safely. When you’re a mindful bicyclist who monitors the traffic situation and sees when it would be unsafe to allow yourself to be passed, you can simply use a lane position that does not allow it. Voilá! You’ve just eliminated the most extreme unsafe passing situations!

When it becomes safe to pass, you can move slightly right again to encourage it (but still far enough into the lane to get your good passing distance), and maybe give a little head nod or thank-you wave to acknowledge the driver. If they’ve had to slow down and wait for a chance to pass, in most cases they give you plenty of room once they are able to!

Communication Is Important

Your lane position by itself is a form of communication, which CyclingSavvy calls “passive communication.” If the situation requires it, you can add hand motions such as “stay back” during the control phase, followed by “go ahead” or “thank you” when you move over to release. We call this “active communication.” (Some people feel that waving motorists on is not a good idea. I tend to agree in general, but it’s not a hard and fast rule. Sometimes you want to keep them from hesitating too long. But I usually just give a thank-you wave.)

Bicyclists riding at edge in narrow lane

Sometimes, it’s just not safe to allow yourself to be passed.

I’m convinced that most people really want to do the right thing by cyclists, but it’s easy for them to make a mistake. They assume there’s room when there’s not, or they just don’t plan ahead. They are not helped when the cyclist hugs the edge and does not communicate at all, leaving the motorist wondering if they should pass or not. Naturally, some of them are overly-optimistic.

I don’t know the cyclist who sent my friend this letter. If I had to, I’d guess that he’s not very assertive in his lane position, but I obviously don’t know that for sure.

I know from my own experience that some rural roads here in Maine do tend to have more aggressive motorists than others, and that is challenging. But if that orange arrow is really working for him, I’ll bet that more assertive lane positioning would, too. Maybe someday we’ll get to meet and talk about it.

6 replies
  1. Tim Potter
    Tim Potter says:

    This is a very helpful article for solo riders. Could you perhaps elaborate here or in a separate article about how larger groups of cyclists should ride to assure maximum safety of the riders AND the passing motorists? I’ve participated in some large day tours that are mostly on very narrow country roads that are often hilly and windy (poor visibility for higher-speed motorists) where the organizers instruct their tourists that they must move into single-file when motorists approach from the rear.

    I believe this near universal response by groups of cyclists to fall into single-file formation when someone yells “CAR BACK!” oftentimes is exactly the wrong thing to do as it encourages and invites motorists to pass when the road conditions and oncoming traffic dictate that motorists should not be encouraged to pass.

    • John Brooking
      John Brooking says:

      Yes, it’s true, I’m more oriented towards solo riding than group riding, because I hardly ever ride in groups, and never in organized pelotons. Around here, as most places, I suspect, it’s really the groups that get people upset, because motorists do have this expectation you mention, that bicyclists should single up to facilitate passing. I occasionally hear of a municipality that wants to create an ordinance requiring it, or at least post signs encouraging it.

      And I agree with you that it’s not really very good advice, but even many ride and tour organizers think it’s the proper thing. Our advocacy organization states this instruction at their rides as well, and I disagree. I think what underlies this expectation in most if not all cases, in groups as well as for solo riders, is the unexamined and incorrect assumption that having the cyclist(s) move to the edge will always create enough room for a car to pass. As you and I know, that’s often not true, but I doubt it occurs to many non-cyclists.

      When I do ride with a loosely-organized group, I tend to prefer to ride sweep, so that I can be the one to interact with motorists coming up from behind. I choose my lane position based on my own judgement, regardless of what the others are doing. It’s sometimes awkward, which I suppose is one reason I don’t ride with groups regularly. (Also, time.)

      From a purely operational perspective, in my opinion the best thing for large groups to do to facilitate passing is to split into smaller groups, maybe a dozen or so cyclists each, to keep the passing column short enough that it’s easier for motorists to find a place to pass, and only do so one small group at a time rather than one large one, even two abreast. However, this seems to be an unpopular idea in a lot of groups, for reason of group dynamics that I don’t completely understand because I don’t ride with them. Also, they will claim that they are already riding near the posted speed in many cases, and that may well be true. So it’s a sensitive debate.

      CyclingSavvy has a group leader course under development, and the basic advice about singling/doubling up is that if the group CAN be safely passed while single file, but not while double, then single is okay and advisable. But those situations are not very common. If even a single cyclist could not be passed safely no matter how far to the right they are, then staying double is most appropriate. In a situation where the lane cannot be shared by even one cyclist, the adjacent lane must be clear in any case, so staying double makes the column shorter (I know you know this), without making it any harder for the motorist to use the adjacent lane. Problem being of course that most motorists don’t get this, and see riding double as an affront (probably because they think we CAN move over, we’re just not).

      In any case, safe and appropriate sharing by an entire group seems to me it would require having knowledgeable ride leaders as well as a cohesive group with a well-established communication protocol. Since both of these are generally lacking in large ride events and in touring groups, and even in some pelotons, I can see how organizers just go with simplest advice possible, even if some of us believe it’s too simple. I don’t know what the answer is. (For me, it’s riding solo most of the time.)

  2. Thomas Scott
    Thomas Scott says:

    Thank you for the reinforcement. After reading about this topic on this site several years ago I had the same experience. Moving 1/3 of the way into the lane changed near daily close passes into virtually no close passes during my commute on a 2 lane state hwy. Keep up the good work!


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply